4 ms·
You are pretending that this is equivalent to asserting that they have access to arbitrary message histories, which they in fact do not.
by embolism 13y ago
You are pretending that this is equivalent to asserting that they have access to arbitrary message histories, which they in fact do not.
- jmillikin 13y agoNo, I'm not. At no point have I ever claimed that being able to intercept messages is equivalent to having access to previous messages.
- embolism 13y agoFair enough, but actually your other point doesn't stand either because the prevailing understanding is that the keybag mechanism allows the clients to detect and report when another device is provisioned, and that the password is needed to join a new device to the keybag. Therefore although Apple could add another device to the communication protocol, without the password another device cannot be added to the encryption session, or without alerting the end user.