That the court doesn't find these claims any more broad or abstract than any other is more a condemnation of the status quo for these kinds of patents. Because

That the court doesn't find these claims any more broad or abstract than any other is more a condemnation of the status quo for these kinds of patents. Because, truly, this one isn't egregiously bad in its phrasing. It's at least as well-defined as any number of such patents that have held up under re-examination. And therein lies the larger problem.