3 ms·
You realise that you are replying to JIMMY CARTER?? Are you seriously accusing Jimmy Carter of moral relativism? of not understanding the meaning of words like
by alextingle 13y ago
You realise that you are replying to JIMMY CARTER??
Are you seriously accusing Jimmy Carter of moral relativism? of not understanding the meaning of words like "undemocratic", "despot", or "dictatorship"? of wanting to see a weaker US??
I suggest you stop throwing around baseless ad hominem attacks, and actually address the points raised.
- pdonis 13y agoAre you seriously accusing Jimmy Carter of moral relativism? of not understanding the meaning of words like "undemocratic", "despot", or "dictatorship"? of wanting to see a weaker US?? This would be the Jimmy Carter who kissed up to Hamas? http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/apr/16/jimmy-carter-and-hamas/ http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/apr/16/jimmy-carter...
- alextingle 13y agoGreat! More ad hominem. Keep it coming. Look, I'm not saying that you have to agree with anything the guy is saying, but simply dismissing him as "doesn't know what he's talking about" is insufficient.
- pdonis 13y agosimply dismissing him as "doesn't know what he's talking about" is insufficient Then it's a good thing I didn't do that. I pointed out a specific instance in which he supported a definition of "peace" which, to put it mildly, seems a bit inconsistent with the usual sense of the word. It's not ad hominem to criticize a person based on things they've actually said or done that are relevant to the issue at hand.