3 ms·
> There is no doubt that America's past is stained with human rights violations. However, to hold up America as equivalent to the current regimes in China or Ru
by king_jester 13y ago
> There is no doubt that America's past is stained with human rights violations. However, to hold up America as equivalent to the current regimes in China or Russia (to name just two) is laughable by anyone with an understanding of history.
That other countries exist with their own violations of humans rights doesn't negate any kind of criticism about the United State w.r.t. human rights. You can be critical of more than one thing at a time.
> I'm sick of the moral relativism that you see when people point out American's shortfalls. You see words like "undemocratic", "despot", "dictatorship" thrown around by people who have little understanding what those words mean.
Many people have a good idea of what those words mean and the United State's actions and policies can most certainly be described with those words throughout various times in its history.
- refurb 13y agoI have no problem with people criticizing the US. In fact, it something that makes the US such a great country. US citizens should be holding their elected representatives' feet to the fire when they stray from the constitution. However, using words like "undemocratic", "despot" and "dictatorship" to describe the US cheapen those words and do a great disservice to the MILLIONS of people who have died under such regimes.
- scarmig 13y agoThat makes no sense at all. By that logic, it's also offensive to call the contemporary PRC and Russia undemocratic, despotic, and dictatorial because millions of people aren't dying under those regimes.