3 ms·
>It's whether the action has the effect of prejudicing the United States or benefiting a foreign government regardless of intent. I wonder if there is a preced
by fnordfnordfnord 13y ago
>It's whether the action has the effect of prejudicing the United States or benefiting a foreign government regardless of intent.
I wonder if there is a precedent supporting successful use of that charge. That's very broad wording. Taken literally, nearly anything you say that isn't puppies and rainbows could qualify.
- eli 13y agoNearly anything you say about a classified intelligence program to unauthorized people, you mean. Yeah, I think that's the point :)
- fnordfnordfnord 13y agoCan't you see the Kafka-esque nature of such a condition?