Any ism is reductionist, always with some loss of information. Sometimes they're beneficial, every thought we have is the result of extremely downsampled data.

Any ism is reductionist, always with some loss of information. Sometimes they're beneficial, every thought we have is the result of extremely downsampled data. But without being mindful that simplifications are at play they can be much more dangerous. It is hard or impossible to know which simplifications are actually happening in many cases, because the blanket is the only handle that many data have been tagged with - not the sum of their intricacies.