>You don't classify innocuous material just because it might be embarrassing. You're wrong. That's a well-known, ongoing, and acknowledged problem in the US wh

>You don't classify innocuous material just because it might be embarrassing. You're wrong. That's a well-known, ongoing, and acknowledged problem in the US which even has its own act of Congress as an attempt to deal with the problem. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr553 http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr553 Here, if you like a good Catch-22: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121126/01371621143/defense-department-overclassifies-memo-avoiding-overclassification.shtml https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121126/01371621143/defen...