24 ms·
It would seem to me that no explicit arithmetic is being done - it's simply a consequence of natural behaviour. Consider the case of a starch channel, the size
by jbri 13y ago
It would seem to me that no explicit arithmetic is being done - it's simply a consequence of natural behaviour.
Consider the case of a starch channel, the size of which is governed by two factors - the quantity of stored starch, and the time since nightfall. (Other factors may also affect the size, but are irrelevant to this discussion). This seems like a construct that could quite feasibly appear in a plant. No arithmetic is being performed by the plant, but simply these two factors working in concert cause the rate of starch consumption to appear to be based on whatever the starch level was when night fell.
The fact that the observed rate of consumption is such that nearly all the starch is consumed by morning is easily explained by natural selection - plants that consume starch too fast obviously starve overnight, while plants that consume it too sparingly are using their resources inefficiently and so would tend to be out-competed by plants that make better use of them. Over many generations, the base rate of consumption would become tuned to how long nights last in that region.
- seanalltogether 13y ago> Over many generations, the base rate of consumption would become tuned to how long nights last in that region. From the article - "the starch store lasts until dawn even if the night comes unexpectedly early or the size of the starch store varies." The point is that the plants can handle 2 changing variables
- jbri 13y agoNight coming unexpectedly early is just one thing that could cause the amount of starch stored to vary. There's only factor changing here.