3 ms·
I wanted to make the same comment after reading the article. You're correct. The "+" literal in the URL is a painful remnant and at least when encoding I think
by Udo 13y ago
I wanted to make the same comment after reading the article. You're correct. The "+" literal in the URL is a painful remnant and at least when encoding I think it should be avoided entirely - so I think the article has it wrong when they say the string has to be encoded differently depending on its place within the URL. However, it's something to be aware of when decoding.
- gpvos 13y agoThe only problem I can think of is that the URL becomes a bit longer than necessary, so you might hit IE's URL length limit a bit earlier.