3 ms·
If I read the article correctly, all he did was use Glass as a live-stream POV camera. How is this different than the pre-Glass era? I think what would be sign
by chrsstrm 13y ago
If I read the article correctly, all he did was use Glass as a live-stream POV camera. How is this different than the pre-Glass era?
I think what would be significant is if Glass were able to enhance his ability as a surgeon during the procedure, rather than just allowing remote viewing.
- csomar 13y agoA lot. He doesn't need another assitant for the camera. Also he might be able to communicate with another doctor while in operation and have better control of the video.
- chrsstrm 13y agoWearing Glass is no different that wearing a POV camera. Communication still falls into the realm of everything that was possible pre-Glass. Now if the patient swallowed some nanobots that found their way to source of the problem and then Glass guided the doctor to that location via a Google Navigation-like interface, that would be impressive.