> I don't really see why a larger population should mean that cheating is incentivized more, unless the real problem is an undersupply (proportionately) of educ

> I don't really see why a larger population should mean that cheating is incentivized more, unless the real problem is an undersupply (proportionately) of education. I interpreted dmoy's comment much differently. I thought the point was that since there are so many people entering Uni, they just don't have the resources to penalize enough people for cheating. The obvious solution is to put people on site and prevent it rather than look for it after-the-fact, but apparently that results in rock throwing protests...