7 ms·
Want to consolidate all of my comments into one, so here goes: 1. Raw footage of the crash, that Mercedes (appears to be a 2012 C-Class Coupe) is fully engulfe
by dakrisht 13y ago
Want to consolidate all of my comments into one, so here goes:
1. Raw footage of the crash, that Mercedes (appears to be a 2012 C-Class Coupe) is fully engulfed in flames. The car blew up on impact. How is another question.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LSY3wVuASg http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LSY3wVuASg
2. Dash cam footage of driver running red light (Highland Avenue & Santa Monica Blvd) at a high rate of speed. Video dissolves moments later (something was cut from it)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNhqKRugk8Q http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNhqKRugk8Q
3. 5:00 into first video (crash) - you can see the entire transmission thrown over 200 feet into the sidewalk.
4. Car is really on fire here, not sure a C-250 fuel tank (17.4 gallons) could create that big of a fireball? And that's a full tank.
5. I will assume Mercedes would engineer the car with the fuel pump cutting off from the engine at the moment of impact. All electrical systems, fuel, combustion, etc. would be disconnected for this reason.
6. He was traveling at a high rate of speed (80+ mph). Highland Avenue is a nice two-land (in each direction) street, no potholes, bumps, smooth like a baby's ass (that particular section of the street). The palm trees are also fairly thin compared to some bigger ones we have here.
7. Who are these LANewsLOUDLABS people? Why are they filming a) the red light at that gas station, b) the accident site shortly after (but going through side streets as opposed to simply going straight and making a right turn?) and c) have an LAPD police scanner (LAPD uses trunked communication, you need a $500+ scanner, of course, accessible to anyone (and legal) with $500.00. But a, b, and c just seem odd...
8. You can tell briefly that the car used by "news" above has a silver exterior. I'm not sure of the make/model, does NOT really sound like a V8 to me, maybe a turbo 6... Driver saying "oh shit" seems genuine, if that makes a difference.
Prelim thoughts:
1) He was going fast, really fast.
2) He ran a red light (there's always a reason for this: alcohol, bad judgment, being chased by someone, etc.)
3) Vehicle burst into flames - but when?
4) Engine and transmission over 200 feet away from crash site (tree)
5) That roof is gone, there's a big hole with flames shooting out - but this car has a panorama sunroof. That glass shattering + high impact collision = hole.
6) Any arson specialists, chemists - feel free to chime in on the pattern, color, position, spread of the burns at 3:00 of the video.
7) The cockpit is intact - so is the drivers seat - the engine is gone, the car is badly damaged in the front, but if there was no fire, I'd say bad injuries but alive. Fire killed the guy.
- jlgreco 13y ago> 7. Who are these LANewsLOUDLABS people? Why are they filming a) the red light at that gas station, b) the accident site shortly after (but going through side streets as opposed to simply going straight and making a right turn?) and c) have an LAPD police scanner (LAPD uses trunked communication, you need a $500+ scanner, of course, accessible to anyone (and legal) with $500.00. But a, b, and c just seem odd... > 8. You can tell briefly that the car used by "news" above has a silver exterior. I'm not sure of the make/model, does NOT really sound like a V8 to me, maybe a turbo 6... Driver saying "oh shit" seems genuine, if that makes a difference. If there was a conspiracy here (and I am not saying one way or the other), then why would these people be involved? Why would the conspiracy organizers throw in extraneous details that would only serve to arouse suspicion? It's like 9/11 conspiracies... if you were a shady CIA dude who wanted to start a war by flying some planes into buildings, why wouldn't you actually just fly planes into buildings? All the things that 9/11 conspiracy theorists point to are not things that would make sense from the perspective from a conspiracy organizer. Thermite, empty drone planes, missles? Why not just actually use a plane? Similarly, why not just let the local news cover the planned crash as they normally would, or not give a shit if they don't? If I were planning some sort of conspiracy, that's how I'd do it...
- informatic001 13y agoI am not a big fan of conspiracy theorists. However, I would encourage anyone to look into 911truth.org as well as do your own research with a critical and open mind. Consider all the subsequent events triggered by 9/11 it is worth a closer look. HN, let me know what you think. -------------------- Here is their TOP 40 REASONS TO DOUBT THE OFFICIAL STORY OF SEPTEMBER 11th, 2001 http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041221155307646 http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041221155307646
- lotso 13y agoIn regards to #7, it looks like they film stuff like this often http://www.youtube.com/user/LAnewsLOUDLABS/videos http://www.youtube.com/user/LAnewsLOUDLABS/videos
- rdouble 13y ago