4 ms·
> Meanwhile, investigators are still looking into what caused Hastings to crash on Tuesday. They are trying to find out if the car had a technical problem or if
by reledi 13y ago
> Meanwhile, investigators are still looking into what caused Hastings to crash on Tuesday. They are trying to find out if the car had a technical problem or if he may have had a medical condition that caused him to wreck.
There's speculation online that it was a bomb, which isn't under technical problems or medical conditions. Which makes me wonder, would investigators conclude it was a bomb if there was ample evidence?
- TerraHertz 13y agoAren't you forgetting the long, sad history of official investigators lying their arses off? For instance take just one example - the TWA 800 'investigation'. With recent whistleblowers coming forward with details of what a coverup that was. Not trying to derail, but for anyone interested: http://everist.org/archives/links/_TWA_800_links.txt http://everist.org/archives/links/_TWA_800_links.txt
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- dakrisht 13y agoDoubt it. We hear what they want us to hear. Also not sure about the speculation online... Things that fly are more appealing.
- jlgreco 13y agoWhy would some nefarious conspiracy orchestrator put a bomb in the car? If you are going to cause a crash, why throw a bomb into the mix too? It would only serve to cause more suspicious and loose ends. The absolute most that makes any sense is a gallon jug or two of gas under the seat just to be sure, but even that is really pushing it. Think about it, if you were tasked with causing somebody to be declared dead in a car crash, would you also put a bomb in the car? Only if you wanted to be caught maybe...
- tomjen3 13y agoNo, I wouldn't. But then the car blow up (sending the transmission way away) and cought fire. A car doesn't blow up and doesn't catch fire from hitting a tree. A bomb fits the evidence much better.
- jlgreco 13y agoIt makes no goddamn sense to put a bomb in the car. Unless your hypothetical conspirators are idiots or suicidal, then "sometimes crazy, unusual, or unintuitive shit can happen during high-energy collisions" is far more plausible, regardless of if it was intentional. > A car doesn't blow up and doesn't catch fire from hitting a tree. Yeah, you keep saying that... Here is Ryan Dunn's 911 after a tree was done with it: http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/06/21/article-2006369-0CA708FE00000578-802_634x471.jpg http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/06/21/article-2006369-0C...