So, I read this article early today. Then later, I was just googling interesting things, and thus surfing ensued... I landed here (http://answers.yahoo.com/qu

So, I read this article early today. Then later, I was just googling interesting things, and thus surfing ensued... I landed here (http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090119104804AAyQ7aF http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090119104804AA...), and noticing the nature of the comments/avatars. Do you think it would be possible to find "reliable"-confirmation that "even on the internet", 'female personalities', in situations where one would expect 'care ethics' to be emergent on the social graph (perhaps health care industry), could one find numerical-"confirmation" of the one-to-one vs one-to-many interactions hypothesized in the article? ...or is that just a cyclical thought... a bias?