4 ms·
So much this. People on this forum have consistently presented very compelling arguments that they don't have SSL keys and couldn't retroactively decrypt collec
by Phlarp 13y ago
So much this. People on this forum have consistently presented very compelling arguments that they don't have SSL keys and couldn't retroactively decrypt collected traffic even if they did. Unsettling then that people I generally considered trustworthy in the crypto community (say, Matt Blaze) previously were adamant to claim that large scale duplication and retention of backbone traffic was not only highly unlikely to be attempted, but technically unfeasible.
Because of this I'm almost ashamed of how much credit I've been doling out to other allegedly shady accusations that get made and dismissed as passing conspiracy theories.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- coldtea 13y agoJust because someone is an expert in the field, doesn't mean what he says is to be trusted. Some are just supporting the status quo and the "government wisdom". Some might even be paid to say what they say or be linked by contracts to such stuff.