> It's a serious mistake trying to turn this into the usual one party versus the other thing. That depends what you mean by "mistake". Historically speaking, o

> It's a serious mistake trying to turn this into the usual one party versus the other thing. That depends what you mean by "mistake". Historically speaking, obfuscating the real issues by slinging mud at the other guy and pretending you're enormously different and it's not your problem has proven effective in rallying the proles to fall in line, is it any surprise this would be a continuously attempted tactic in this instance also?