3 ms·

You would need a much more comprehensive overview process to eliminate misleading information from movies, even if it were limited to life-threatening misinform

You would need a much more comprehensive overview process to eliminate misleading information from movies, even if it were limited to life-threatening misinformation! One instance I can think of is MRI magnets. Often, a medical drama will cut to someone pushing a button and the magnet coming on. In reality, the magnets are always on and bringing metal objects within range can have dire consequences. The whole movie Home Alone depicts life-threatening pranks on the burglars. c.f. dropping a clothing iron 3 stories onto someone's face.

mikeash 13y ago
Banning the portrayal of drivers looking at their passengers while talking to them would probably save more lives than banning inaccurate portrayals of drowning.
- b0rsuk 13y ago
  Fine, let's do both. I can't think a of valid reason the driver should be looking at passengers while talking (I mean, not in the mirror). The law could really just affect swimming and driving. Both activities are common and can result in death if you're not careful.
- clarkmoody 13y ago
  Correct. However, drowning is high on the list[1] of common causes of injury death for children. Vehicle accidents are the 1st for ages 5-24. [1] http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/pdf/10LCID_Unintentional_Deaths_2010-a.pdf http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/pdf/10LCID_Unintentional_D...
- jstanley 13y ago
  I don't know, I think looking at passengers while talking is something you do once and then realise that it is stupid. I did it once, because it seemed natural to look at the person I was talking to, but I immediately felt endangered and have never done it since. Whereas with the inaccurate portrayal of drowning response, by the time you've realised that what you're doing is wrong somebody is dead.
b0rsuk 13y ago
At least in the case of Home Alone, actors show signs of pain and even injury. From there it's a matter of magnitude. In case of drowning, it's the difference between nothing happening and someone dying. Not someone drowning slightly.

mikeash 13y ago

Banning the portrayal of drivers looking at their passengers while talking to them would probably save more lives than banning inaccurate portrayals of drowning.

b0rsuk 13y ago
Fine, let's do both. I can't think a of valid reason the driver should be looking at passengers while talking (I mean, not in the mirror). The law could really just affect swimming and driving. Both activities are common and can result in death if you're not careful.
clarkmoody 13y ago
Correct. However, drowning is high on the list[1] of common causes of injury death for children. Vehicle accidents are the 1st for ages 5-24. [1] http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/pdf/10LCID_Unintentional_Deaths_2010-a.pdf http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/pdf/10LCID_Unintentional_D...
jstanley 13y ago
I don't know, I think looking at passengers while talking is something you do once and then realise that it is stupid. I did it once, because it seemed natural to look at the person I was talking to, but I immediately felt endangered and have never done it since. Whereas with the inaccurate portrayal of drowning response, by the time you've realised that what you're doing is wrong somebody is dead.

b0rsuk 13y ago

At least in the case of Home Alone, actors show signs of pain and even injury. From there it's a matter of magnitude. In case of drowning, it's the difference between nothing happening and someone dying. Not someone drowning slightly.