3 ms·
There comes a point when you're just circling the wagons, be careful of that. My gut feeling is that this guy is right. This kind of stuff is above my pay grad
by benreesman 18y ago
There comes a point when you're just circling the wagons, be careful of that.
My gut feeling is that this guy is right. This kind of stuff is above my pay grade, so if I'm wrong I'm wrong, that's the risk with intuition.
I think that important decisions need to be made on firmer grounds than 'pythonicity'. Reminds me of when PG talks about 'yellowism'.
- silentbicycle 18y agoThe deal with what's "Pythonic" is that Guido believes it's better to have Python be clear upfront about what it does and doesn't do well, and to have a relatively straightforward way to express those things. This is in reaction to languages such as Perl that have several ways to do the same thing, sometimes with counter-intuitive differences in performance. It's good to ask whether the benefit of adding feature X to the language is worth the cost of making it that much larger. While I would choose a different subset of features, I think he's got a good point.