3 ms·
I agree with you that the web is not only about words, but I don't think that was necessarily what Justin's post was trying to say. He said words are a powerful
by robmclarty 13y ago
I agree with you that the web is not only about words, but I don't think that was necessarily what Justin's post was trying to say. He said words are a powerful tool on the web, that global communication is magical, and that it doesn't need to be overly complicated to share ideas with others. He said "start with with words" not "only ever use words and nothing else".
I think he was indeed placing a greater weight on the value of words over other tools, but I don't think that's necessarily incorrect. Certainly the web is about more than just words: it's about connecting human ideas together. Those connections can take form through a vast array of media. But I agree with Justin that at its core, the web is more about words than it is about videos or images or WebGL (as it is today). If you took the words out of the internet I think I would be missing some of the most important parts. If I didn't have access to youtube or flickr (videos or images) I think I'd still have access to a lot of the value I find in the internet.
- MichaelAza 13y agoI felt that Justin was making the point the web is about words which I strongly disagree with. The words are a means, an important one and arguably the most important one, to an end. Words are not what the web is about in the same way paint isn't what art is about.
- robmclarty 13y agoYeah I agree. I don't think that's what he was saying though. I think he was pretty clear that the words are a tool (i.e., a means to an end). I think he said webdesign should be about words (i.e., don't get wrapped up in frilly widgets and shinny buttons over the content of your communications), not that the web itself is about words.