Link to LW statement: http://blog.leaseweb.com/2013/06/19/statement-on-former-client-megaupload/ http://blog.leaseweb.com/2013/06/19/statement-on-former-clie...

Link to LW statement: http://blog.leaseweb.com/2013/06/19/statement-on-former-client-megaupload/ http://blog.leaseweb.com/2013/06/19/statement-on-former-clie... Why does LW have to explain anything? They're under no contractual or legal obligation to hold onto rented servers for more than a year without payment. Had these been servers MU owned outright, I would be a little more sympathetic to Dotcom. However I find it highly unlikely that LW didn't follow their end of the ToU and more likely that the contact information Dotcom had on file was either outdated or incorrect (that or he and his lawyer are just lying or manipulating the facts to support their narrative).