4 ms·
I take it you don't. Is it because you think there are no meaningful differences across sexes? Really, give this a shot: http://denisdutton.com/baumeister.htm
by noaharc 17y ago
I take it you don't. Is it because you think there are no meaningful differences across sexes? Really, give this a shot: http://denisdutton.com/baumeister.htm http://denisdutton.com/baumeister.htm.
- biotech 17y ago"Is it because you think there are no meaningful differences across sexes?" I agree with the GP, but not with this comment. Obviously there are meaningful differences between the sexes. But there are other ways to group people, as well: - Gender (already covered, here) - Age - Nationality - Ethnicity - Sexual Orientation - Political Orientation - Religious Orientation - Number of Older Siblings - ... the list goes on All of these factors are significant in the sense that they help to establish our unique identity, and there are meaningful differences in each category. Should we poll for each factor? At some point..... well, I can't say it more succinctly than the GP: "Who cares?"
- whughes 17y agoCertainly, we've had polls for some of these (I remember age specifically) in the past, and we'll probably have them again as the user base changes. With the context of an increasing number of gender-related articles, I think this information is valuable.