3 ms·
Great idea, lets hope it catches on. Unfortunately it seems like parts have been translated into 'trendy' - for example > Government should only do what only g
by piqufoh 13y ago
Great idea, lets hope it catches on. Unfortunately it seems like parts have been translated into 'trendy' - for example
> Government should only do what only government can do.
uh, what?
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- anu_gupta 13y agoIf you had continued to read the rest of that paragraph, you would have seen this: > If someone else is doing it — link to it. If we can provide resources (like APIs) that will help other people build things — do that. We should concentrate on the irreducible core.
- piqufoh 13y agoI had continued reading it, and I maintain that single sentences must make (at least logical) sense by themselves. This is marketing jargon trash, and should not be encouraged in a web standards document!
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- snowwrestler 13y agoWhat is "trendy" about that? I don't see a single buzzword and the meaning is very clear to me.
- piqufoh 13y agoOK we disagree, but let's hope the English language survives (though it seems the UK gov. isn't going to champion it).