3 ms·
Precisely so. I consider myself to be a pretty good coder because I'm good at keeping track of many things going on at once (I used to be a chip designer in a p
by arbuge 13y ago
Precisely so. I consider myself to be a pretty good coder because I'm good at keeping track of many things going on at once (I used to be a chip designer in a prior life), but I'm 100% sure I'd flunk the puzzles that companies interviewing for coders throw out in their interviews.
Good to see a realization by Google that those puzzles aren't all that useful: http://qz.com/96206/google-admits-those-infamous-brainteasers-were-completely-useless-for-hiring/ http://qz.com/96206/google-admits-those-infamous-brainteaser...
Google might be one company where algorithmic wizardry might be expected to be more important than most, so that's saying something...
- goyalpulkit 13y agoI think that the only reason the algorithmic interviews are still so common is because of the difficulty in analyzing the real skills of the candidate. I have worked with guys really good at algorithms, but it is no way related to how good they are at building complex projects.