2 ms·
"The two men were in federal court Wednesday on charges that they conspired to provide material support to terrorists, including use of a weapon of mass destruc
by jmadsen 13y ago
"The two men were in federal court Wednesday on charges that they conspired to provide material support to terrorists, including use of a weapon of mass destruction."
I'm starting to think rolling a large rock down a hill at a group of people would be considered "a weapon of mass destruction"
Does the term have any meaning anymore, or is it just a pile-on item to aid in plea bargains?
- anigbrowl 13y agoIt's very specifically defined in law, and has been since 1994: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2332a http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2332a
- jmadsen 13y agoThank you - that was quite informative, actually. I don't think I'm alone in feeling that that term seems to many people more like a label they hang on "terrorists" rather than something with a specific definition