4 ms·
Sucks to be Kim but why should another third, seemly innocent party, have to suffer too? 600 servers that be leased at, say, $100 a month is $60,000 a month or
by throwaway10001 13y ago
Sucks to be Kim but why should another third, seemly innocent party, have to suffer too?
600 servers that be leased at, say, $100 a month is $60,000 a month or $720K a year. Kim, FedGov...Jesus or whoever should pay if they want to keep the servers idle. Leaseweb had more patience than I would have had.
As for evidence: My guess is that the Feds have enough preserved servers to make their case. You do not need them all unless you want to file 100++ million charges. If they have 10 servers and within them they have enough data about xxx violations of the law, that's good enough. He will be charged with them and that's it.
Low blow from Kim.
- avargas 13y agoAlso note that $100 per month is pretty low-ball figure.
- DanBlake 13y agoI think its high ball. The servers were no doubt paid-for by that point. The only real cost they could have is depreciation on the servers themselves and power to keep them on. I dont think its fair to call potential income they could get from re-renting them lost money, as its not like leaseweb stopped taking customer orders. Also, I think this is actually going to be good for Kim. While everyone from the MU side denys it, the overwhelming use for MU was infringing content. By LW deleting this, I believe it benefits MU more than it hurts them. Prosecution has to prove guilt, not the other way around. If evidence gets deleted that goes to serve MU, not the USDOJ.