I'm not sure giving extra kudos to those using git/hg instead of cvs/svn is appropriate either. You usually use what the employer has (demands), even if it's a

I'm not sure giving extra kudos to those using git/hg instead of cvs/svn is appropriate either. You usually use what the employer has (demands), even if it's an abomination like MS Source Safe, Serena Version Manager, MKS Source Integrity or Clearcase :-) A better criteria might be what you do with the rev ctrl system: concurrent development; release candidate tracking; release change audit support.