If you look at FAA 702, it's been clear since 2007-2008 that the court does NOT deliberate on and grant an order for each request. See my article from 2007: ht

If you look at FAA 702, it's been clear since 2007-2008 that the court does NOT deliberate on and grant an order for each request. See my article from 2007: http://news.cnet.com/FAQ-How-far-does-the-new-wiretap-law-go/2100-1029_3-6201032.html http://news.cnet.com/FAQ-How-far-does-the-new-wiretap-law-go... "...expands the National Security Agency's power to eavesdrop on phone calls, e-mail messages and other Internet traffic with limited court oversight...warrants are not needed for Internet or telephone "surveillance directed at a person reasonably believed to be located outside of the United States..." And 2009: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10143520-38.html http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10143520-38.html ..."a secret federal appeals court has ruled that federal agencies can be authorized to conduct warrantless e-mail and telephone surveillance without violating the U.S. Constitution"...