3 ms·
But we don't know the details. We know the rounded, approximate number of "terrorist attacks" and we know of one vague storied "plot". There's no details to wei
by drivebyacct2 13y ago
But we don't know the details. We know the rounded, approximate number of "terrorist attacks" and we know of one vague storied "plot". There's no details to weigh or consider. We still don't have a complete picture of the surveillance in use, but as far as I'm concerned, a live and archived-accessible account of most all of my online dealings/writings/readings/purchases... constitutes a pretty huge loss of privacy, though clearly not "absolute".
- Tloewald 13y agoI won't disagree with this, but when some details are presented and argued over it's wrong to dismiss them airily as being irrelevant and compare the situation to a straw man involving absolute loss of privacy.