4 ms·
If this is the case it should be rather straightforward for you to provide an answer to the question I posed in the previous comment, which you have yet to do.
by run4yourlives 13y ago
If this is the case it should be rather straightforward for you to provide an answer to the question I posed in the previous comment, which you have yet to do.
- freehunter 13y agoI'll freely admit I'm no expert; I wasn't arguing that I am. I was merely pointing out the fact that four is not a statistically relevant sample size when the population is potentially in the thousands. If you're an expert in the area, I'd like to hear your answer to your question, or a more relevant sample size. What I'm pointing out is that "most" has a definition, and less than 1% doesn't meet that critera.