No. I'm not convinced "terrorism" cases should be handled any differently than any other criminal cases. It's such a vague term, I'm not even sure it should b

No. I'm not convinced "terrorism" cases should be handled any differently than any other criminal cases. It's such a vague term, I'm not even sure it should be possible to prosecute it. What does it even mean for a person to "be a terrorist"? Clearly if a person has blown up a building or plane they should be prosecuted for that. But trying to prosecute before the fact in the name of counter-terrorism seems a little too much like thought crime, IMO.