3 ms·
In most cases no-one will want to blackmail you. But people do blackmail journalists, judges and/or political figures with power. There is a track record of thi
by trevelyan 13y ago
In most cases no-one will want to blackmail you. But people do blackmail journalists, judges and/or political figures with power. There is a track record of this sort of thing having been done even in countries like Canada (where the wife of a former PM was illegally monitored to try and get dirt on the guy). Or look at Nixon and Hoover.
In any environment where mass surveillance is technically possible and hidden from effective and comprehensive public oversight, abuse becomes permitted and hidden.
So standing up for privacy is not just a matter of protecting your own identity (although that is frankly reason enough). It is about protecting the conditions under which a free press and democratic society can survive, and in which individuals can act according to their moral conscience even when such conscience leads them to oppose entrenched power structures. And you should care about what happens in the United States not only because God knows how its security apparatus will use this data against your own country and elected leaders, but because American discourse influences global perceptions of what is seen as an acceptable level of state surveillance in other countries.
- e3pi 13y ago> But people do blackmail journalists, ... It's been like ten days since Guardian/Greenberg made public the four powerpoints as authentic evidence. We had the Q&A this morning, but offers nothing new from the supposed existence of all the data leaked we've been teased with. I get the strategic timed-release explanation, but on the other hand, could it be, with the US-UK tightly coupled intelligence agencies, that the Guardian has now a gag order? If so, and after the Wasington Post waffling, does ES have a plan C?
- mryan 13y agoThe Ministry of Defence has issued a D notice preventing the UK media from 'publish[ing] information that may "jeopardise both national security and possibly UK personnel"'. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/17/defence-d-bbc-media-censor-surveillance-security http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/17/defence-d-bbc-me...
- e3pi 13y agoPLAN C: what's left-- pastebin, that New Yorker thing(no, gag order), Anonymous posting onto defaced sites, wikileaks, ... more?