4 ms·
While he is right that you may not ever need the CPU resources, the RAM I would argue is necessary (plus it's only $100 and will overall make a HUGE difference)
by aalbertson 13y ago
While he is right that you may not ever need the CPU resources, the RAM I would argue is necessary (plus it's only $100 and will overall make a HUGE difference).
Ram is one of those things you can almost never get enough of. I am a heavy chrome user (and general system user), and I cringe anytime it's less than 8GB because it requires much more tab management for me. Which may be better for me to do, but I keep a large amount of misc work in various chrome windows and tabs, and closing it isn't necessary for me.
Along with that, I'm often running a bunch of other apps. CPU is never usually a problem, but RAM definitely is.
That being said, you're probably fine with the base model, but I certainly would at least max the ram. :)
- hashtree 13y agoAlso, it isn't upgradable after the fact in the MBAs.
- kbar13 13y agoespecially with OSX, where ram is guzzled like no other.
- voltagex_ 13y agoYou sure it's not just the caching tricking you? It's been a long time since I used a Mac but I'd be surprised if it didn't cache as much as possible. Unused RAM is wasted RAM.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- rangibaby 13y agoLion (fixed in 10.8 AFAIK) has a bad habit of preferring to page to the disk instead of freeing up RAM that is being used for caching. I was able to remedy this by using the terminal command "purge" occasionally, and also disabling the dynamic pager[1] [1]http://workstuff.tumblr.com/post/20464780085/something-is-deeply-broken-in-os-x-memory-management http://workstuff.tumblr.com/post/20464780085/something-is-de...
- ghshephard 13y agoLion was absolutely broken in terms of memory management from 10.7.0 through at least 10.7.3sh. (Beach Balls during pageouts, constant memory pressure, weird page-out while using Safari + Aperture - really made me miss 10.6.8) Things got much better in 10.7.4, and 10.7.5 has been so reliable and well balanced that I'm afraid to ever leave it.
- lysium 13y agoThat paging drives me nuts, but nobody seemed to have the same issue. Thanks for posting the helping pointer! (I'm afraid of disabling the dynamic pager, though, as I hit max physical RAM rather often.)
- jmuguy 13y agoYeah there really isn't a reason to not get more RAM in a PC. Everything else is debatable. The CPU in particular the guy was right on. I'd say the SSD is a wash.
- Domenic_S 13y agoYou mean getting an ssd generally is a wash? Because SSDs are crazy good. I just had one installed on my work MBP (2012) and the performance is astounding.
- anonymoushn 13y agoThe only option for the MBA is between different sizes of SSDs.
- egypturnash 13y agoThe only PRE-BUILT option. If you're willing to wait for a built-to-order, you can bump the processor, memory, and storage. I'm typing this on a brand new 13" with twice the default RAM and SSD; I didn't feel most of what I do is CPU-bound enough to bump that as well.
- dekz 13y agoIt's more of a 'wash' because you can do it after the purchase. Processor and RAM upgrades can't be done.
- jmuguy 13y agoOh no definitely not, I mean the bigger SSD. You could probably get away with 256 if you didn't want to pay more. But yeah SSD over spinning disk - no contest.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- PanMan 13y agoI was quite disappointed to see that after the latest upgrade the air still doesn't support more then 8 gb. If I buy a machine for the next few years, I want more ram than the current 2008 MacBook Pro I have...