4 ms·
I think the non-legalese gist of it was that by enumerating the right of citizens, it's too easy to get around them on technicalities. "Reasonable suspicion? Su
by eloisius 13y ago
I think the non-legalese gist of it was that by enumerating the right of citizens, it's too easy to get around them on technicalities. "Reasonable suspicion? Sure, we can come up with reasonable."
A negative definition puts the ball on the other side of the court. "Being searched, where does it say specifically that you have a right to search me?"