I find the legal stuff mentioned in the article of interest - that a telegram is taken seriously by the judiciary - as if it were given in person. This is pote

I find the legal stuff mentioned in the article of interest - that a telegram is taken seriously by the judiciary - as if it were given in person. This is potentially huge. I suppose there is room for a service that notarizes (something like that, no offense meant to notaries!) messages before sending them in an otherwise very casual fashion, as well as records receipt in a somewhat official way could take it's place. There is still probably room for such a thing/