2 ms·
For whatever reason, you feel the need to defend the value of your degree. You forget that people have various reasons (some personal) for seeking knowledge.
by eaurouge 13y ago
For whatever reason, you feel the need to defend the value of your degree. You forget that people have various reasons (some personal) for seeking knowledge. It's not always about gaining marketable skills or about learning all there is to know about a subject.
Many of the points you make in your critique (lack of depth, etc) are obvious to anyone that decides to read the book. As an example, the book Learn Modern 3D Graphics Programming [1] has been posted and praised on HN in the past, but it should be obvious to anyone that there's a lot more to Computer Graphics than that book alone.
I think your comments would be more valuable if you had something more positive to add, perhaps in addition to criticism. If this book glosses over some topics, perhaps you could suggest some learning resources for those topics.
1. http://www.arcsynthesis.org/gltut/ http://www.arcsynthesis.org/gltut/
- mmcnickle 13y agoI have to agree. The GP is getting bent out of shape. I think him describing the limitations of the course would be useful if not worded so defensively. This is like a professional fabricator complaining that the 10 hour welding course at night-school doesn't cover welding aluminium. I don't think anyone was under the impression that this was a replacement for a an engineering degree. People will do this course because it's cool to build stuff you thought was beyond you. Also, enroll in a welding course, it's cool to be able to build big stuff out of metal too.