2 ms·
This post is a negative critique of Haml which points out that it is not an improvement over HTML - it makes working with designers more cumbersome for one thin
by villageidiot 17y ago
This post is a negative critique of Haml which points out that it is not an improvement over HTML - it makes working with designers more cumbersome for one thing. A somewhat different viewpoint from a StackOverflow user:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/93540/your-attitude-to-haml/430325#430325 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/93540/your-attitude-to-ha...
- melvinram 17y agoThat persons code doesn't do HAML justice. I converted an ERB file to HAML. A quick glance shows it to be simpler... even though it's mostly the same code: http://pastie.org/private/n8ipfrkxlremo4jwtxiww http://pastie.org/private/n8ipfrkxlremo4jwtxiww More detailed response is here: http://railsnotes.com/395-response-to-thoughts-on-haml/ http://railsnotes.com/395-response-to-thoughts-on-haml/
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]