4 ms·
I agree - that line from the article makes no sense. Not having NAT is awesome because NAT is a nasty hack that doesn't add any security. The tunnelling scenar
by stephen_g 13y ago
I agree - that line from the article makes no sense. Not having NAT is awesome because NAT is a nasty hack that doesn't add any security.
The tunnelling scenario is valid though - because they add quite a bit of latency so you might not want to use it for everything.