Presumably Americans don't care that much about Internet surveillance, given the representatives they have elected and the big giant "meh" that has come everyti

Presumably Americans don't care that much about Internet surveillance, given the representatives they have elected and the big giant "meh" that has come everytime an NSA or FBI story about aforementioned surveillance has been leaked. Which is more risky for police state purposes, a PRISM system that requires at least corporate legal review for specific individuals, or a system that would tap into all Internet traffic? Now, which of those have we known about for a longer time?