5 ms·
There are many threats to human life. There is a cost associated with preventing each life lost. Obviously it makes sense to consider it. We could have never
by stretchwithme 13y ago
There are many threats to human life. There is a cost associated with preventing each life lost. Obviously it makes sense to consider it.
We could have never allowed foreign tourists into the country. That has a cost associated with it, right? That would prevented Saudis from going to flight school and booking those flights, right? Shouldn't protecting lives be before every other consideration?
No, we have to balance things. Protecting life can not prevent us from living our lives. Not everything the government chooses to do is worth the price.
- rayiner 13y agoIf we're going with a cost/benefit analysis, it should be noted that the NSA accessing data that AT&T, Google, Facebook, etc, already collect is just about the cheapest sort of counter-measure you could have to terrorism. The "good old fashioned police work" that people keep suggesting would be far more expensive and invasive.
- stretchwithme 13y agoThen let people volunteer for it in exchange for lower taxes. If the impact is truly minor, there should be many takers and much savings.
- rayiner 13y agoThat makes no sense.
- CamperBob2 13y agoWhat makes no sense is assuming that all of the data collection being discussed has prevented a single genuine attack.
- stretchwithme 13y agoOh, they told us it has. Shouldn't that be good enough? They've been open and honest so far.
- threeseed 13y agoAre you answering the right person ? Because I was specifically talking about the costs associated with terrorist acts. And that preventing them has significant and widespread benefits to the economy. It's pretty clear that focusing just on ROI alone this program is easily worth the price.
- stretchwithme 13y agoAnd just banning foreigners is free. The ROI is infinite on free things that work. But ROI is not the only consideration.