2 ms·
I don't know. It's a bit like saying Sherlock Holmes invades your privacy because he's naturally more observant.
by lelandbatey 13y ago
I don't know. It's a bit like saying Sherlock Holmes invades your privacy because he's naturally more observant.
- mike-cardwell 13y agoThe information: 1.) Whether an email was opened 2.) When it was opened 3.) What IP was in use when it was opened Is not public. The fact that the sender of an email can exploit a loop hole in the technology so that they can gather that information, and the fact that it is commonly exploited to do so, does not make it ok. I would agree with your Sherlock Holmes analogy, but only if being "naturally more observant" falls within the category of climbing through somebodys bedroom window, hiding under their bed and observing what they're doing without them knowing you're there.
- qu4z-2 13y agoIn fairness, that sounds like something Sherlock Holmes would very plausibly do. Then again, we all know he's kind of an ass, if a lovable one.