3 ms·
You can't possibly argue that using Backbone for models is idomatic AngularJS. If you're arguing that with a bunch of extra code on top of AngularJS it does wh
by EvilTrout 13y ago
You can't possibly argue that using Backbone for models is idomatic AngularJS.
If you're arguing that with a bunch of extra code on top of AngularJS it does what Ember does out of the box, that was kind of my point.
- ldn_tech_exec1 13y ago...fair. What's your take on points #1, #2, #3 and #5?
- EvilTrout 13y agoYou CAN make Angular work like Ember, but you have to add a lot of code to do what Ember encourages you to do off the bat. What you are suggesting is good practice but something that I suspect very few Angular developers do as it's not encouraged by the framework itself. If you follow the guides on the official Angular site, they're done none of the things you suggest.
- ldn_tech_exec1 13y agoUmm.. nothing in #1, #2, #3 or #5 requires any extra code. If you're argument is about what Ember 'encourages' vs what AngularJS 'encourages', that is your opinion and not a weakness in the framework. I think it's great you've taken some time to learn AngularJS, and I think if you dig a little deeper you will be pleasantly surprised with what you find.