3 ms·
Disclaimer: I work for Google but the following is my personal opinion. FWIW, the part about never deviating from the "One True Way" or the description of Goog
by sxp 13y ago
Disclaimer: I work for Google but the following is my personal opinion.
FWIW, the part about never deviating from the "One True Way" or the description of Google as "a rigid environment with adherence to arbitrary guidelines" is simply not true. One of the things that is brought up in the initial orientation is that Google is meant to be fault-tolerant and flexible across the board. From an engineering aspect this means that if a single server crashes due to bad code, the system should be flexible enough take steps to recover. From an employee aspect, if the employee isn't happy with their job, they should be able to flexible enough to take steps to recover.
However, since Google doesn't micromanage its employees, the employee might forget that this is an option and remain unhappy. In my case, I realized that I wasn't happy with my position a few months after joining the company, remembered what I was told in orientation, talked to HR, and moved to a different position where I was much happier.
If I thought the rules were actually inflexible, then I would have stayed in my original position, got burned out, quit after a few months, and probably complained about the company to others. Google is flexible, but requires the person to actually take advantage of this flexibility.
- jrockway 13y agoIndeed. I think Google is a better place for people that make their own rules than for those that blindly do everything they're told.