3 ms·

"Now I’m not saying any of that is the case. For all I know, this was all just done by some automated software or a low-level grunt" I think you missed this pa

• ErrantX 17y ago
  shrug so why imply it in the first place then? The assertion is that his idea of what happened was worth more than the other posters. Indeed from my experience of huge corporations (which comes from fairly regular contact) none of his (3) scenarios are particularly likely... EDIT: (because the above was an unclear reply). my point being he is trying to say the people in that thread are probably wrong whilst offering 3 or so alternatives that are, equally, probably wrong too. Whilst he does admit he cant know what really went down that is not what he seems to suggest in the rest of the post. My point is like PG's: he is falling foul of his own arguments :( and badly. His example is like many of the "culprits" he ID's on here who lay out their opinions in a very specific way and then throw in a "but it could be like a, b, c of course" as a way to make out they are open to any suggestion... ;) :P