6 ms·
It seems like it should be possible to make a much lighter weight encrypted email protocol than, say, GnuPG. Address books should have a public key field. Ema
by cottonseed 13y ago
It seems like it should be possible to make a much lighter weight encrypted email protocol than, say, GnuPG. Address books should have a public key field. Emails should have a X-Public-Key: and X-Signature: fields. You can add key exchange on the existing protocol. If you've got a public key in your address book, outgoing emails should be encrypted. It seems like it would be trivial for GMail or Thunderbird to support something like this. I realize this doesn't solve all the problems GnuPG does, but email exchange would be encrypted, it would be easy to adopt, and would let the end user choose manage keys and store emails encrypted (Thunderbird, say) or not (GMail).
- lignuist 13y ago> Address books should have a public key field. Smart.
- mpyne 13y agoThey do, in the DoD.
- Zigurd 13y agoIt's really curious how cloud services companies could be doing all this and more to build confidence in their services. Imagine, for example, NFC-based key signing parties - just touch your smartphones. But not a word, yet. Not one word.