How can people not see the parallels between the anti Snowden crowd and Nazis who were "just following orders" when they took part in the pogroms? Everyone who

How can people not see the parallels between the anti Snowden crowd and Nazis who were "just following orders" when they took part in the pogroms? Everyone who takes part in this latest abrogation of the US Bill of Rights is no better than the Nazi exterminators. Some will say that the authors of the US Constitution had no concept of electronic communications ergo we should not expect the 4th Amendment to extend to electronic communications, yet the wording of the 4th Amendment includes the communications methods of their day, which would be "papers and effects," and that the lawful search thereof must be accompanied by "Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." Others will say that the authors of the US Constitution had no concept of "terrorism," yet England viewed the revolutionaries as such. Perhaps if our government weren't meddling in the affairs of foreign nations, those foreign nationals would not feel a need to engage in "terrorist" acts? So, instead of using some fictitious son-of-the-invisible-sky-person principle, we could apply the "What would a Nazi do" principle.