3 ms·
Assuming that the weights of the lift car and the passenger load remain about the same, moving the motor to the car saves the weight of the cable, but adds the
by dmckeon 13y ago
Assuming that the weights of the lift car and the passenger load
remain about the same, moving the motor to the car saves the weight
of the cable, but adds the motor, power contacts, and whatever
traction device (cog?) moves the car.
edit: completely overlooked counter-weight balance, see:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5887522 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5887522
Adding regenerative braking adds some form of energy storage -
batteries, flywheel, compressed air, or whatever. A flywheel might
be lighter than batteries, but torque I/O might affect passenger comfort.
It would be interesting to see how CF holds up over time. ISTR that
Kevlar rope is very strong, but turned out to have unexpected issues
with repeated jerky load/unload cycles. Presumably the CF elevator
cable would have adequate testing before commercial use.
- ars 13y agoFor regenerative I would just dump it back into the grid. There are plenty of other consumers in a skyscraper, the meter would not even flow backward. I'm also wondering this about CF - my understanding is it's strong, but has very poor abrasion resistance. Even if you avoid external abrasion you can't avoid internal as the fibers rub against each other when they bend.