4 ms·
For not being interested in "the semantic argument", you have previously shown lots of confidence in the Governments secret semantic interpretation. No evidenc
by revelation 13y ago
For not being interested in "the semantic argument", you have previously shown lots of confidence in the Governments secret semantic interpretation.
No evidence has been published, and who is talking about Google Mail anyway?
- tptacek 13y agoI'm not interested in the semantic argument about whether publishing a story that contradicts a previous story without issuing a correction on that previous story counts or does not count as a "walk back", that term having no specific technical meaning the argument can rely on. I'm not averse to all semantic arguments.