3 ms·
mpyne - thanks for clarifying: I see it now. I've never been a fan of "slippery slope" arguments because once you start on them, you never know where they finis
by tomslee 13y ago
mpyne - thanks for clarifying: I see it now. I've never been a fan of "slippery slope" arguments because once you start on them, you never know where they finish.
I know why FSF takes the line it does, I'm just saying it is a line that has taken us to a strange place where open source advocates are simultaneously supplying the NSA with services to carry out surveillance, defending the practice, but complaining about the surveillance.
And as for "Accumulo is a tool". That's kind of a "guns don't kill people" argument. Would you apply the same argument to private companies supplying authoritarian regimes with deep packet inspection software? I see little difference in the cases.
- mpyne 13y agoI'm not a super big fan of slippery slope arguments either. Then you get people opposing programs not on their own merits, but what might happen if that program were in the hands of the "other party", and then later in the hands of some dystopian totalitarian state. Either way, I'm not sure why you say open source developers are supplying the NSA with Accumulo. You have it completely the wrong way around; NSA supplied us with Accumulo.