5 ms·
Swedish article on the matter: http://www.aftonbladet.se/minekonomi/article16839634.ab http://www.aftonbladet.se/minekonomi/article16839634.ab I have no idea i
by pathy 13y ago
Swedish article on the matter: http://www.aftonbladet.se/minekonomi/article16839634.ab http://www.aftonbladet.se/minekonomi/article16839634.ab
I have no idea if Skatteverket (IRS equivalent) were right in their decision but the guy did lose in the first court instance.
Also: If the Facebook page was public and Skatteverket were questioning the legitimacy of the 'business purchase', why shouldn't they check the page? Basing the decision on only one status update seems a bit strange though.
- seivan 13y agoThey weren't questioning or investigating, they outright fined based only on that status report. Guilty until proven innocent.
- pathy 13y agoThey probably wouldn't have looked the page unless they were auditing him. He found their decision unfair and appealed it but lost in court, so at least one instance considers Skatteverket's claims legitimate. Now I have less faith in the lower courts than I should but it does bring legitimacy to Skatteverket's decision.