4 ms·
From the article: > Rope-based completion was always unreliable, slow or both. I haven't used rope. Is the author wrong about this?
by tl 13y ago
From the article:
> Rope-based completion was always unreliable, slow or both.
I haven't used rope. Is the author wrong about this?
- jaegerpicker 13y agoNot in my experience. On Mac OS X in emacs, vim, and sublime text 2 rope based auto complete is pretty poor compared to PyCharm, X Code (5 which I've been using the beta since it's release pretty heavily is really REALLY good at this compared to 4), and Visual Studio.
- coolsunglasses 13y agoI've used PyCharm before, IME people that complain about Rope autocompletion aren't adding the virtualenv to their Rope search paths. As for slowness? only on init. After that, it's as close to instantaneous as it gets.